Table 1 Comparison of Single Black Hole Attack Detection Schemes
From: A survey of black hole attacks in wireless mobile ad hoc networks
Schemes | Routing protocol | Simulator | Detection type | Publication year | Results | Defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neighborhood-based and Routing Recovery [26] | AODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2003 | The probability of one attacker can be detected is 93% | Failed when attackers cooperate to forge the fake reply packets |
Redundant Route and Unique Sequence Number Scheme [27] | AODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2004 | Verify 75% to 98% of the routes | Attackers can listen to the channel and update the tables for last sequence number |
Time-based Threshold Detection Scheme [28] | Secure AODV (SAODV) | GloMoSim | Single detection | 2007 | The PDR of SAODV is around 90 to 100% when AODV is around 80% | The end-to-end delay increases when the malicious node is away from source node |
Random Two-hop ACK and Bayesian Detection Scheme [29] | DSR | GloMoSim-based | Cooperative detection | 2007 | The true positive rate can achieve 100% when existing 2 witness | The proposed scheme is not efficient when k equals to 3, reducing the true positives |
REAct [30] | DSR | - | Single detection | 2009 | Reduces the communication overhead but enlarges the identification delay | The binary search method is easily expose audit node's information |
DPRAODV [31] | AODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2009 | The PDR is improved by 80-85% than AODV when under black hole attack | A little bit higher routing overhead and end-to-end delay than AODV |
Next Hop Information Scheme [32] | AODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2010 | The PDR is improved by 40-50% and the number of packets dropped is decreased by 75-80% than AODV | Few additional delay |
Nital Mistry et al.'s Method [33] | AODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2010 | The PDR is improved by 81.811% when network size varying, and rise 70.877% when mobility varying | Rise in end-to-end delay is 13.28% when network size varying, and rise 6.28% when mobility varying |
IDS based on ABM [34] | MAODV | NS-2 | Single detection | 2010 | The packet loss rate can be decreased to 11.28% and 14.76% | Cooperative isolation the malicious node, but failed at collaborative black hole attacks |