Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of Collaborative Black Hole Attack Detection Schemes

From: A survey of black hole attacks in wireless mobile ad hoc networks

Schemes Routing protocol Simulator Publication year Results Defects
DRI and cross checking [36] AODV No simulator 2003 No simulation results -
DRI table and cross checking using FREQ and FREP [37] AODV - 2007 A higher throughput performance almost 50% than AODV 5-8% more communication overhead of route request
DCM [38] AODV NS-2 2007 The PDR is improved from 64.14 to 92.93%, and the detection rate is higher than 98% A higher control overhead than AODV
Hash based [39] Hashed-based DSR - 2009 No simulation results -
MAC and Hash-based PRF Scheme [40] AODV NS-2 2009 The PDR is higher than 90% when AODV is inaccessible 50% The malicious node is able to forge a fake reply to dodge the detection scheme
BBN and RIP [41] AODV - 2010 No simulation results -
BDSR [43] DSR QualNET 2011 The PDR of BDSR is always higher than 90% The overhead is minimal higher than DSR, but lower than WD approach
  1. -: means unmentioned