Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of Collaborative Black Hole Attack Detection Schemes

From: A survey of black hole attacks in wireless mobile ad hoc networks

Schemes

Routing protocol

Simulator

Publication year

Results

Defects

DRI and cross checking [36]

AODV

No simulator

2003

No simulation results

-

DRI table and cross checking using FREQ and FREP [37]

AODV

-

2007

A higher throughput performance almost 50% than AODV

5-8% more communication overhead of route request

DCM [38]

AODV

NS-2

2007

The PDR is improved from 64.14 to 92.93%, and the detection rate is higher than 98%

A higher control overhead than AODV

Hash based [39] Hashed-based

DSR

-

2009

No simulation results

-

MAC and Hash-based PRF Scheme [40]

AODV

NS-2

2009

The PDR is higher than 90% when AODV is inaccessible 50%

The malicious node is able to forge a fake reply to dodge the detection scheme

BBN and RIP [41]

AODV

-

2010

No simulation results

-

BDSR [43]

DSR

QualNET

2011

The PDR of BDSR is always higher than 90%

The overhead is minimal higher than DSR, but lower than WD approach

  1. -: means unmentioned