Table 3 MANOVA results of tests of between subjects effects
From: A comparison between experienced and inexperienced video game players’ perceptions
Source | Dependent variable | Type III sum of squares | df | Mean square | F | Sig. | Partial Eta squared | Noncent. parameter | Observed powerb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corrected model | Pragmatic quality score | 597.089a | 3 | 199.030 | 6.279 | .000 | .087 | 18.837 | .963 |
Hedonic identification score | 1067.555c | 3 | 355.852 | 14.236 | .000 | .178 | 42.708 | 1.000 | |
Hedonic stimulation score | 999.925d | 3 | 333.308 | 11.958 | .000 | .154 | 35.875 | 1.000 | |
General appeal score | 1268.029e | 3 | 422.676 | 8.724 | .000 | .117 | 26.171 | .994 | |
Intercept | Pragmatic quality score | 172708.495 | 1 | 172708.495 | 5448.668 | .000 | .965 | 5448.668 | 1.000 |
Hedonic identification score | 161124.726 | 1 | 161124.726 | 6445.859 | .000 | .970 | 6445.859 | 1.000 | |
Hedonic stimulation score | 184829.438 | 1 | 184829.438 | 6631.310 | .000 | .971 | 6631.310 | 1.000 | |
General appeal score | 207533.996 | 1 | 207533.996 | 4283.357 | .000 | .956 | 4283.357 | 1.000 | |
NovExp | Pragmatic quality score | 185.969 | 1 | 185.969 | 5.867 | .016 | .029 | 5.867 | .674 |
Hedonic identification score | .199 | 1 | .199 | .008 | .929 | .000 | .008 | .051 | |
Hedonic stimulation score | 4.197 | 1 | 4.197 | .151 | .698 | .001 | .151 | .067 | |
General appeal score | 240.925 | 1 | 240.925 | 4.973 | .027 | .025 | 4.973 | .602 | |
Game played | Pragmatic quality score | 261.792 | 1 | 261.792 | 8.259 | .004 | .040 | 8.259 | .816 |
Hedonic identification score | 1013.265 | 1 | 1013.265 | 40.536 | .000 | .171 | 40.536 | 1.000 | |
Hedonic stimulation score | 857.933 | 1 | 857.933 | 30.781 | .000 | .135 | 30.781 | 1.000 | |
General appeal score | 757.067 | 1 | 757.067 | 15.625 | .000 | .073 | 15.625 | .976 | |
NovExp * game played | Pragmatic quality score | 44.793 | 1 | 44.793 | 1.413 | .236 | .007 | 1.413 | .219 |
Hedonic identification score | 2.854 | 1 | 2.854 | .114 | .736 | .001 | .114 | .063 | |
Hedonic stimulation score | 60.007 | 1 | 60.007 | 2.153 | .144 | .011 | 2.153 | .309 | |
General appeal score | 47.990 | 1 | 47.990 | .990 | .321 | .005 | .990 | .168 | |
Error | Pragmatic quality score | 6244.384 | 197 | 31.697 | |||||
Hedonic identification score | 4924.335 | 197 | 24.997 | ||||||
Hedonic stimulation score | 5490.831 | 197 | 27.872 | ||||||
General appeal score | 9544.896 | 197 | 48.451 | ||||||
Total | Pragmatic quality score | 190512.000 | 201 | ||||||
Hedonic identification score | 180411.000 | 201 | |||||||
Hedonic stimulation score | 204267.000 | 201 | |||||||
General appeal score | 232682.000 | 201 | |||||||
Corrected Total | Pragmatic quality score | 6841.473 | 200 | ||||||
Hedonic identification score | 5991.891 | 200 | |||||||
Hedonic stimulation score | 6490.756 | 200 | |||||||
General appeal score | 10812.925 | 200 |