From: A method of designing a generic actor model for a professional social network
Actors | Common characteristic features | Weight of actors | Relation among actors |
---|---|---|---|
1. PS and JS1 | \(pro_{PS}^1 = PhD = 23,\, pro_{JS1}^1 = ME = 18,pro_{PS}^4 = pro_{JS1}^4 = collector = e^2,act_{PS}^2 = act_{JS1}^2 = publications = 2\) | \(W_{PS} = 8.0972,\;W_{JS1} = 6.8472\) | \(W_{PS} > W_{JS1}\) Hierarchical relation |
2. PS and JS2 | \(pro_{PS}^1 = PhD = 23,\, pro_{JS2}^1 = ME = 18,pro_{PS}^4 = pro_{JS2}^4 = collector = e^2,act_{PS}^2 = act_{JS2}^2 = publications = 2\) | \(W_{PS} = 8.0972,\) \(W_{JS2} = 6.8472\) | \(W_{PS} > W_{JS2}\) Hierarchical relation |
3. JS1 and JS2 | \(pro_{JS1}^1 = pro_{JS2}^1 = ME = 18,pro_{JS1}^4 = pro_{JS2}^4 = collector = e^2,act_{JS1}^2 = act_{JS2}^2 = publications = 2\) | \(W_{JS1} = 6.8472,\) \(W_{JS2} = 6.8472\) | \(W_{JS1} = W_{JS2}\)Equivalence relation |
4. JS1Â and PA1 | \(pro_{JS1}^1 = ME = 18, \,pro_{PA1}^1 = BE = 16,pro_{JS1}^3 = pro_{PA1}^3 = conference = 0.8632\) | \(W_{JS1} = 4.7158,\) \(W_{PA1} = 4.2158\) | \(W_{JS1} > W_{PA1}\) Hierarchical relation |
5. JS2 and PA2 | \(pro_{JS2}^1 = ME = 18,\, pro_{PA2}^1 = BE = 16,pro_{JS2}^4 = pro_{PA2}^4 = collector = e^2,act_{JS2}^2 = act_{PA2}^2 = publications = 2\) | \(W_{JS2} = 6.4097\), \(W_{PA2} = 6.3472\) | \(W_{JS2} > W_{PA2}\) Hierarchical relation |