Table 5 Actors along with their common characteristic features, weights, and relations used in the MSN
From: A method of designing a generic actor model for a professional social network
Actors | Common characteristic features | Weight of actors | Relation among actors |
|---|---|---|---|
1. \(a_1G_1\) and \(a_2G_1\) | \(pro_{a_1G_1}^1 = PhD = 23,pro_{a_2G_1}^1 = ME = 18\) | \(W_{a_1G_1} = 5.75,\; W_{a_2G_1} = 4.5\) | \(W_{a_1G_1} > W_{a_2G_1}\) Hierarchical relation |
2. \(a_1G_1\) and \(a_3G_1\) | \(pro_{a_1G_1}^1 = PhD = 23,pro_{a_3G_1}^1 = ME = 18\) | \(W_{a_1G_1} = 5.75,\; W_{a_3G_1} = 4.5\) | \(W_{a_1G_1} > W_{a_3G_1}\) Hierarchical relation |
3. \(a_2G_1\) and \(a_3G_1\) | \(pro_{a_2G_1}^1 = pro_{a_3G_1}^1= ME = 18\) | \(W_{a_2G_1} = 4.5,\; W_{a_3G_1} = 4.5\) | \(W_{a_2G_1} = W_{a_3G_1}\) Equivalence relation |
4. \(a_2G_1\) and \(a_4G_1\) | \(pro_{a_2G_1}^1 = ME = 18,pro_{a_4G_1}^1 = BE = 16\) | \(W_{a_2G_1} = 4.5,\; W_{a_4G_1} = 4\) | \(W_{a_2G_1} > W_{a_4G_1}\) Hierarchical relation |
5. \(a_3G_1\) and \(a_5G1\) | \(pro_{a_3G_1}^1 = ME = 18,pro_{a_5G1}^1 = BE = 16\) | \(W_{a_3G_1} = 4.5,\; W_{a_5G1} = 4\) | \(W_{a_3G_1} > W_{a_5G1}\) Hierarchical relation |