From: Featuring the e-service quality of online website from a varied perspective
Model | Construct | Item | Factor loading | SMC | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SERVQUAL | Reliability (REL) | REL1 | 0.877 | 0.770 | 0.793 | 0.939 |
REL2 | 0.903 | 0.816 | ||||
REL3 | 0.860 | 0.740 | ||||
REL4 | 0.919 | 0.845 | ||||
 | Responsiveness (RES) | RES1 | 0.815 | 0.665 | 0.716 | 0.910 |
RES2 | 0.878 | 0.770 | ||||
RES3 | 0.844 | 0.713 | ||||
RES4 | 0.848 | 0.718 | ||||
Assurance (ASS) | ASS1 | 0.920 | 0.847 | 0.787 | 0.936 | |
ASS2 | 0.859 | 0.738 | ||||
ASS3 | 0.886 | 0.786 | ||||
ASS4 | 0.881 | 0.775 | ||||
Empathy (EMP) | EMP1 | 0.854 | 0.729 | 0.725 | 0.913 | |
 | EMP2 | 0.861 | 0.741 | |||
EMP3 | 0.865 | 0.748 | ||||
EMP4 | 0.827 | 0.683 | ||||
Tangibles (ERQ) | ERQ1 | 0.897 | 0.804 | 0.821 | 0.902 | |
ERQ2 | 0.915 | 0.837 | ||||
QES | Graphic quality (GQ) | GQ1 | 0.876 | 0.767 | 0.794 | 0.920 |
GQ2 | 0.901 | 0.812 | Â | Â | ||
GQ3 | 0.888 | 0.789 | Â | Â | ||
Clarity of layout (COL) | COL1 | 0.908 | 0.824 | 0.849 | 0.944 | |
COL 2 | 0.929 | 0.863 | Â | Â | ||
COL3 | 0.928 | 0.861 | Â | Â | ||
Attractiveness of selection (AOS) | AOS1 | 0.942 | 0.887 | 0.879 | 0.936 | |
AOS2 | 0.934 | 0.872 | Â | Â | ||
Information quality (IFQ) | IFQ1 | 0.869 | 0.755 | 0.771 | 0.910 | |
IFQ2 | 0.897 | 0.805 | Â | Â | ||
IFQ3 | 0.869 | 0.755 | Â | Â | ||
Ease of use (EOU) | EOU1 | 0.870 | 0.757 | 0.758 | 0.926 | |
EOU2 | 0.848 | 0.719 | Â | Â | ||
EOU3 | 0.901 | 0.812 | Â | Â | ||
EOU4 | 0.864 | 0.746 | Â | Â | ||
Technical quality (TQ) | TQ1 | 0.903 | 0.815 | 0.836 | 0.938 | |
TQ2 | 0.941 | 0.885 | Â | Â | ||
TQ3 | 0.899 | 0.808 | Â | Â | ||
Reliability (REL) | REL1 | 0.874 | 0.764 | 0.793 | 0.939 | |
REL2 | 0.900 | 0.810 | Â | Â | ||
REL3 | 0.865 | 0.748 | Â | Â | ||
REL4 | 0.922 | 0.850 | Â | Â | ||
Function benefit (FB) | FB1 | 0.926 | 0.857 | 0.872 | 0.932 | |
FB2 | 0.941 | 0.885 | Â | Â | ||
Emotional benefit (EB) | EB1 | 0.941 | 0.885 | 0.857 | 0.923 | |
EB2 | 0.909 | 0.826 | Â | Â | ||
WPI | Website performance (WP) | WP1 | 0.800 | 0.640 | 0.560 | 0.910 |
WP2 | 0.838 | 0.702 | Â | Â | ||
WP3 | 0.682 | 0.465 | Â | Â | ||
WP4 | 0.730 | 0.533 | Â | Â | ||
WP5 | 0.734 | 0.539 | Â | Â | ||
WP6 | 0.719 | 0.517 | Â | Â | ||
WP7 | 0.698 | 0.487 | Â | Â | ||
WP8 | 0.761 | 0.579 | Â | Â | ||
The framework of this study | Service quality (SQ) | SQ1 | 0.936 | 0.876 | 0.874 | 0.954 |
SQ2 | 0.944 | 0.891 | Â | Â | ||
SQ3 | 0.924 | 0.854 | Â | Â | ||
Affective commitment (AC) | AC1 | 0.838 | 0.702 | 0.758 | 0.904 | |
AC2 | 0.863 | 0.745 | Â | Â | ||
AC3 | 0.910 | 0.828 | Â | Â | ||
Continuance commitment (CC) | CC1 | 0.878 | 0.771 | 0.789 | 0.918 | |
CC2 | 0.907 | 0.823 | Â | Â | ||
CC3 | 0.879 | 0.773 | Â | Â | ||
Normative commitment (NC) | NC1 | 0.703 | 0.494 | 0.620 | 0.830 | |
NC2 | 0.801 | 0.642 | Â | Â | ||
NC3 | 0.852 | 0.726 | Â | Â | ||
Loyalty intention (LI) | LI1 | 0.887 | 0.787 | 0.740 | 0.919 | |
LI2 | 0.902 | 0.814 | Â | Â | ||
LI3 | 0.905 | 0.819 | Â | Â | ||
LI4 | 0.733 | 0.537 | Â | Â | ||
Advocacy intention (AI) | AI1 | 0.879 | 0.773 | 0.753 | 0.924 | |
AI2 | 0.850 | 0.723 | Â | Â | ||
AI3 | 0.861 | 0.741 | Â | Â | ||
AI4 | 0.881 | 0.776 | Â | Â | ||
Willingness to pay more (WTPM) | WTPM1 | 0.917 | 0.841 | 0.840 | 0.940 | |
WTPM2 | 0.919 | 0.845 | Â | Â | ||
WTPM3 | 0.914 | 0.835 | Â | Â |