Table 6 Correctness of the semantic framework for successful and failure cases
From: Incremental stages of a semantic framework for automating the changes on long term composed services
C-ID | C-Type (CT) | Constraint (con) | Status (ST) | No. of nodes | No. of valid nodes | No. of invalid nodes | Reaching final state |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New | Qos | Success (S) | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
2 | New | Qos | Success (F) | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
3 | New | Functionality | Failure | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
4 | New | Functionality | Success | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
5 | New | Functionality | Success | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
6 | New | Qos | Failure | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
7 | New | Functionality | Failure | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
8 | Change existing | Rule | Success | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
9 | Change existing | Rule | Success | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
10 | Change existing | Rule | Failure | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
11 | Change existing | Rule | Failure | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
12 | Change existing | Policy | Failure | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
13 | Change existing | Policy | Success | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
14 | Change existing | Policy | Success | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
15 | Change existing | Policy | Success | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
16 | Change existing | Policy | Success | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
17 | Removal | Policy | Success | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
18 | Removal | Policy | Failure | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
19 | Removal | Rule | Success | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
20 | Removal | Rule | Failure | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
21 | Removal | Policy | Failure | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
22 | Removal | Policy | Success | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 |