Skip to main content

Table 1 UEMs and associated search terms used in the literature review

From: Users’ design feedback in usability evaluation: a literature review

UEM group

UEM

Search terms

Hits (analysed and total)

Usability inspection methods

Pluralistic walkthrough (e.g. [2])

“Pluralistic walkthrough”

First 100 of 315

Participatory heuristic evaluation (e.g. [13])

“Participatory heuristic evaluation”

First 100 of 110

Structured expert evaluation method—SEEM (e.g. [24])

“Structured expert evaluation method”

All of 31

Group-based expert walkthrough (e.g. [25])

“Group-based expert walkthrough”

All of 17

Usability testing methods

Cooperative evaluation (e.g. [14])

Usability AND “Cooperative evaluation”

First 100 of 343

Cooperative usability testing—CUT (e.g. [26])

“Cooperative usability testing”

All of 39

Developer–user contextual evaluation sessions—DUCE (e.g. [61])

“Developer–user contextual evaluation“/” designer user contextual enquiry”

All of 9

Remote asynchronous usability testing (e.g. [44])

“Remote usability testing” AND asynchronous

First 100 of 112

Inquiry methods

Focus group (e.g. [4])

“Usability evaluation” AND “focus group”

First 100 of 1630

Evaluation workshop [60] or Workshop test [28]

Usability AND “evaluation workshop” OR “workshop test”

First 100 of 485

Interview [3]

“Usability evaluation” AND “Interview”

First 100 of 4890

Contextual inquiry (e.g. [29])

“Usability evaluation” AND “Contextual inquiry” OR “Contextual enquiry”

First 100 of 733

The ADA approach (e.g. [12])

Usability AND “ADA approach”

All of 45

Online forums used for evaluation (e.g. [17])

Usability AND “Forum test” OR “forum evaluation”

All of 60

Other

Participatory evaluation through redesign and analysis—PETRA (e.g. [62])

“Participatory evaluation through redesign and analysis”

All of 35

NA

“Usability evaluation” AND “user reports”

All of 94