From: A guide for the selection of routing protocols in WBAN for healthcare applications
Sl. no. | Protocol [ref. no.] | Goal | Performance metrics | Compared with |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Biocomm and Biocomm-D [17] | To optimize the overall performance of the in vivo network | Maximum temperature rise, average energy consumption, packet delivery delay, percentage of injected packets dropped, cumulative network throughput | Shortest hop routing, hotspot preventive routing |
2 | Cascading information retrieval by controlling access with distributed slot assignment (CICADA) [14] | To introduce less delay and low energy consumption | End to end delay | – |
3 | TImezone coordinated sleep scheduling (TICOSS) [15] | To improve 802.15.4 through the division of the network into time zones | Network lifetime | IEEE 802.15.4 without TICOSS |
4 | Wireless autonomous spanning tree protocol (WASP) [16] | To reduce power consumption, network delay and packet loss rate | End to end delay | CSMA with fixed routing |