Table 4 Comparison of experimental results of motion recognition (%)
From: Human motion recognition based on SVM in VR art media interaction environment
Motion type number | K-means-SVM [27] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
1 | 95.72 | 91.16 | 93.77 | 96.74 |
2 | 94.63 | 90.23 | 92.49 | 96.35 |
3 | 93.44 | 93.79 | 92.45 | 95.21 |
4 | 92.84 | 95.83 | 92.41 | 93.2 |
5 | 92.41 | 90.76 | 91.6 | 92.57 |
6 | 92.23 | 92.08 | 90.73 | 91.85 |
7 | 90.93 | 95.65 | 88.28 | 81.47 |
8 | 90.58 | 91.39 | 89.95 | 83.5 |
9 | 90.57 | 89.1 | 89.44 | 85.78 |
10 | 87.64 | 91.51 | 83.21 | 85.61 |
Motion type number | LDA-GA-SVM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Precision | Accuracy | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
1 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 94.9 | 96.66 |
2 | 99.13 | 99.92 | 94.85 | 96.45 |
3 | 98.43 | 98.31 | 94.63 | 95.58 |
4 | 97.78 | 98.02 | 93.14 | 95.45 |
5 | 96.46 | 97.29 | 93.07 | 95.24 |
6 | 95.53 | 96.15 | 92.59 | 95.22 |
7 | 95.39 | 95.77 | 92.23 | 93.05 |
8 | 94.84 | 95.07 | 91.08 | 91.73 |
9 | 94.25 | 95.03 | 90.78 | 91.62 |
10 | 93.19 | 94.97 | 90.53 | 89.06 |