Table 13 Comparative accuracy analysis for activity recognition using semi-population calibration approach
Subjects | RF | HMM | ECOC (AB) | LSTM | AL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject 1 | 34.37% | 39.05% | 38.30% | 42.37% | 56.95% |
Subject 2 | 32.09% | 37.53% | 39.47% | 39.36% | 54.52% |
Subject 3 | 27.52% | 29.87% | 35.72% | 39.59% | 52.17% |
Subject 4 | 30.65% | 32.78% | 39.48% | 38.41% | 53.19% |
Subject 5 | 19.87% | 14.52% | 25.25% | 26.02% | 44.25% |
Subject 6 | 30.73% | 30.96% | 39.30% | 36.25% | 55.00% |
Subject 7 | 36.18% | 39.76% | 42.67% | 42.63% | 61.45% |