Table 6 Comparative analysis for High-level activity recognition
Subjects | RF | HMM | ECOC (AB) | LSTM | AL | # of Act |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject 1 | 50.00% | 51.02% | 56.25% | 62.96% | 64.91% | 12 |
Subject 2 | 48.96% | 56.14% | 59.60% | 64.87% | 69.39% | 13 |
Subject 3 | 51.25% | 49.78% | 55.27% | 59.95% | 67.71% | 13 |
Subject 4 | 53.56% | 51.87% | 61.84% | 67.14% | 73.91% | 12 |
Subject 5 | 39.78% | 34.25% | 45.52% | 46.20% | 54.52% | 8 |
Subject 6 | 52.37% | 58.96% | 67.30% | 66.52% | 72.00% | 11 |
Subject 7 | 51.90% | 59.00% | 66.67% | 65.36% | 72.54% | 10 |