Table 4 A comparison between the different architectures presented in SIoT
From: Social Internet of Things: vision, challenges, and trends
Article | Main Topic | Strengths | Weakness | New Idea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tripathy et al. [9] | Considering the main aspects of SIoT | Considering some scope for future | No simulation | Two dimensional-client and server-architecture |
Ortiz et al. [16] | Considering the main aspects of SIoT | Consider the challenges and open issues deeply | No simulation | A combined architecture of IoT and WoT |
Kim et al. [20] | End-user programming tool for the SIoT | It is easy to learn and use, for both programmers and non-programmers | – | The ontology model architecture |
Atzori and et al. [22] | Integrate social structure concept in IoT | Integration of human social network architecture with SIoT | No simulation | Relational architecture |
Gulati and et al. [23] | The semantic perspective of SIoT | Semantic-oriented platform | No details about their implementation | Semantic-oriented platform architecture |
Gulati and et al. [24] | SIoT architecture | Effective communication management | Static | Three-layer architecture for industrial IoT |
Voutyras et al. [96] | COSMOS project social approach | Improves the knowledge flow | – | A SIoT knowledge flow architecture |