From: Social Internet of Things: vision, challenges, and trends
Article | Main Topic | Strengths | Weakness | New idea |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kim et al. [20] | Empowering end-users for SIoT | High adaptability High efficiency | – | A programming tool |
Atzori et al. [21] | SIoT inter-object relationship | Considering different probability distribution of distance for each relation type | No accuracy in OOR approximation | An analysis model |
Atzori et al. [22] | Social structure in IoT | Improving network navigability Improving network connectivity | Not any implementation or algorithm | An architecture based on objects relationship |
Fu et al. [28] | Social relationship in SSIoTa | Higher network stability Better performance metrics | Faster malicious code propagation | SSIoT model |
Eddy et al. [29] | Social relationship in IIoTb | Considering social interactions for IIoT | Not evaluating service cost | Architecture |
Wei et al. [30] | Social relationship in physical objects | Enhance the speed of the search process Improving availability | Not any development model for the physical objects’ social relationship | Classification of social relationships |
Atzori et al. [31] | Social relationships between things | Implement the major components of the SIoT High scalability | Need more detail in the proposed architecture | Architecture |