Skip to main content

Table 8 A comparison between trust articles with details

From: Social Internet of Things: vision, challenges, and trends

Article Main Topic Strengths Weakness New Idea
Nitti et al. [25] Trustworthiness management in the social IoT High reliability
High adaptability
High efficiency
Not any evaluation on direct trust type Dynamic trust model
Kowshalya and Valarmathi [35] Trust Management Improve performance
High reliability
Not considering low trust value nodes Dynamic trust management model
Xiao et al. [38] Present a guarantor and reputation-based trust model Suitable to detect misbehaved objects Not consider all main trust aspects in large scale networks Guarantor and reputation-based trust model
Chen et al. [39] Trust management and service composition for SOA-based IoT and its application High scalability
High performance
Limited to opportunistic service attacks
Chen et al. [40] Trust-based service management for SIoT High adaptability
High accuracy
High efficiency
Not considering dynamic environment problems Trust Management protocol
Guo and Chen [42] Classification of Trust Computation Comprehensive categorized Trust Computation structure Not considering any trust metrics Trust computation models classification
Bao et al. [44] Trust management for the community of interest Dynamic IoT environment
High adaptability and scalability
Sharma et al. [45] Edge-crowdsourcing in SIoT Maximum availability
Low complexity
Minimum integration cost
Cooperative trust relaying and
privacy-preserving model
Troung et al. [46] Trust service platform for SIoT Improving trust evaluation
High adaptability
- Not any simulation tool and implement an approach Trust service platform
Ling et al. [98] Access service recommendation High rating accuracy
High network Stability
- Not any simulation tools Evaluation parameters
Bachi et al. [99] Categorization of trust/distrust relationship Using generic frequent subgraphs
complex relations
- No comparison between other frameworks and the proposed one Algorithm